Liquidity M2, Inflation, and Sukuk Issuance: Empirical Evidence
Table 2: Optimal lag length result
[Lag no] |
[LogL no] |
[LR Criteria] |
[FPE C.] |
[AIC C.] |
[SC C.] |
[HQ C.] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0) |
-(4059.8) |
[NA] |
4.76e + |
74.55 |
74.62 |
74.58 |
(1) |
-(3621.2) |
845.04 |
1.80e+ |
66.67 |
66.96* |
66.80* |
(2) |
-(3609.3) |
22.238* |
1.70e +* |
66.61* |
67.13 |
66.82 |
(3) |
-(3603.98) |
9.6371 |
1.83e+ |
66.68 |
67.42 |
66.98 |
(4) |
-(3597.8) |
10.959 |
1.92e + |
66.73 |
67.70 |
67.12 |
(5) |
-(3593.9) |
6.5489 |
2.12e+ |
66.82 |
68.01 |
67.31 |
(6) |
-(3588.8) |
8.4971 |
2.29e + |
66.89 |
68.30 |
67.47 |
(7) |
-(3585.1) |
5.8617 |
2.54e+ |
66.99 |
68.62 |
67.66 |
(8) |
-(3580.3) |
7.3967 |
2.76e + |
67.07 |
68.92 |
67.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
< Back to article