Effective Option Of Sugar Beet Harvesting Technology
Table 5: Values of the desirability function for the compared
Brand of the i-th beet harvester | The value of the dj function by the j-th indicators | |||||
d1 operating costs | d2root damage | d3 labor costs | d4 metal consumption | Average | ||
1 | HOLMER | 0.621 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.61 | 0.68 |
2 | SF-10 | 0.671 | 0.628 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
3 | WKM-9000 | 0.693 | 0.8 | 0.76 | 0.61 | 0.72 |
4 | Stoll | 0.2 | 0.324 | 0.432 | 0.2 | 0.29 |
5 | Moro-Lektra | 0.796 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.65 |
6 | WIC complex | 0.8 | 0.48 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.55 |