Effective Option Of Sugar Beet Harvesting Technology
Table 1: Compared
i-th evaluated car | Brand of the i-th beet harvester | Production | j-th estimates | Generalized criterion for comprehensive assessment | ||||
, U | Р | Zt | М | |||||
Operating costs,thous. rubles/ha | root damage,% | labor costs,people -h/ha | metal consumption, kg/ha | Di | ||||
1 | HOLMER | Germany | 4.75 | 20.2 | 0.91 | 41.5 | 0.68 | 0.91 |
2 | SF-10 | Russia and Germany | 4.07 | 32.4 | 0.95 | 29.0 | 0.68 | 0.91 |
3 | WKM-9000 | Holland | 3.74 | 11.8 | 0.84 | 42.0 | 0.71 | 0.93 |
4 | Stoll | Germany | 9.47 | 57.2 | 1.89 | 83.3 | 0.27 | 0.72 |
5 | Moro-lektra | France | 1.9 | 67.2 | 0.65 | 13.1 | 0.57 | 0.85 |
6 | WIC complex | USA | 1.81 | 45.2 | 2.5 | 29.3 | 0.48 | 0.85 |
The weighting factor Kj | 0.44 | 0.31 | 0.19 | 0.06 |