Holdings Or Clusters? Case Study: The Russian Pig Industry
Table 2: The increase of pig farming localizations coefficients (calculated by “pigs (live weight), raised in agricultural organizations”) in Russian regions**
| Regions |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
| Belgorod Region |
6.0 |
7.1 |
8.9 |
12.9 |
19.8 |
21.8 |
22.6 |
24.1 |
26.7 |
26.2 |
24.3 |
23.1 |
21.3 |
20.5 |
20.2 |
| Kursk Region |
1.3 |
1.1 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
1.9 |
2.3 |
2.4 |
3.1 |
5.3 |
7.8 |
9.1 |
11.6 |
11.3 |
12.1 |
12.6 |
| Tambov Region |
0.6 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
1.0 |
1.9 |
1.9 |
2.4 |
5.7 |
8.2 |
8.3 |
8.1 |
7.9 |
7.3 |
| Lipetsk Region |
0.7 |
0.9 |
1.2 |
3.1 |
3.8 |
4.2 |
4.2 |
3.6 |
2.7 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
3.8 |
4.4 |
| Oryol Region |
1.6 |
1.8 |
1.7 |
1.3 |
2.5 |
3.1 |
4.5 |
4.3 |
3.8 |
3.5 |
3.8 |
3.6 |
3.5 |
4.3 |
4.3 |
| Voronezh Region |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.2 |
1.2 |
1.3 |
1.9 |
2.1 |
2.0 |
2.2 |
2.6 |
3.2 |
4.1 |
| Tver Region |
1.8 |
1.7 |
1.5 |
1.4 |
1.5 |
1.2 |
1.4 |
2.3 |
1.9 |
1.3 |
1.5 |
2.5 |
3.6 |
3.9 |
3.8 |
| Smolensk Region |
0.8 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.4 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
| Bryansk Region |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
1.2 |
1.5 |
2.1 |
2.0 |
1.9 |
2.0 |
1.9 |
1.8 |
| Pskov Region |
1.5 |
1.7 |
1.6 |
1.5 |
1.3 |
1.2 |
1.2 |
1.2 |
2.1 |
4.1 |
6.3 |
8.2 |
10.7 |
13.4 |
14.5 |
| Novgorod Region |
1.9 |
2.2 |
2.1 |
2.1 |
2.2 |
1.8 |
1.6 |
2.2 |
2.6 |
2.6 |
2.6 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.2 |
1.9 |
| Mari El Republic |
1.8 |
2.1 |
2.6 |
2.9 |
2.9 |
2.7 |
3.0 |
3.4 |
4.1 |
4.3 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
4.1 |
3.9 |
4.1 |
| Republic of Mordovia |
1.7 |
2.2 |
2.6 |
2.6 |
2.6 |
2.6 |
2.6 |
2.6 |
2.5 |
2.1 |
2.7 |
2.5 |
2.8 |
2.9 |
3.0 |
< Back to article
