The Interrelation Between Labor Productivity And Salary: Economic And Anthropological Aspects
Table 1:
Country/ Year | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 |
Ireland | 98.38 | 104.9 | 114.8 | 105.3 | 104.1 | 100.8 | 103.8 | 130.7 | 102.0 | 105.9 | 105.5 |
Luxembourg | 100.3 | 98.9 | 104.1 | 106.7 | 100.1 | 105.2 | 105.6 | 101.7 | 105.9 | 101.5 | 101.8 |
USA | 102.9 | 104.1 | 103.7 | 102.1 | 102.3 | 102.2 | 102.5 | 101.8 | 101.6 | 103.2 | 103.5 |
United Kingdom | 104.3 | 98.2 | 105.1 | 101.6 | 101.9 | 103.1 | 101.2 | 103.2 | 102.2 | 103.9 | 101.7 |
Russia*** | 120.5 | 99.6 | 104.9 | 108.3 | 105.2 | 102.3 | 99.6 | 92.9 | 101.0 | 107.8 | 109.3 |
Japan | 101.9 | 99.7 | 104.5 | 102.3 | 103.3 | 104.7 | 100.1 | 103.2 | 98.2 | 101.2 | 101.1 |
Mexico | 101.4 | 104.5 | 96.1 | 108.8 | 102.1 | 100.7 | 104.9 | 99.9 | 104.6 | 102.1 | 101.5 |
Source: (OECD. Stat, 2020)*Labor productivity growth rates was calculate based on the level of GDP per hour worked in US dollars, at current prices at purchasing power parity for the period from 2008 to 2018 – https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=54563# |