Environmental And Economic Benefits Of The Russian Alternative Energy Regarding Resource Intensity
Table 2:
| Federal districts | Electricity generation per year million kWh | Alternative energy share in electricity produced, % | Resource intensity in total MI numbers, thousand tons | SPP/PEP/GTP/Small HPP and BioPP, | Greenhouse gas emissions | The difference between specific resource intensity values for alternative and traditional energy industries |
| Far Eastern Federal District | 628291.66 | 1.37 | 47.8 | 98/0/0/2 | 30663.07/0 | 8.8 |
| Volga Federal District | 221.31 | 0.12 | 22.58 | 52/39/0/9 | 65391.73/0 | 7 |
| North-western Federal District | 204.05 | 0.21 | 0.51 | 0/2,5/0/97.5 | 26451.72/0 | 256 |
| North Caucasus Federal District | 621.6 | 2.32 | 1.08 | 1/0/0/99 | 10193.47/0 | 464 |
| Siberian Federal District | 1357.52 | 0.79 | 160.78 | 97/1/0/2 | 91388.28/0 | 15,2 |
| Ural federal district | 35.8 | 0.027 | 0.05 | 0/1,5/0/98.5 | 73916.46/0 | 900 |
| Ural federal district | 147.84 | 0.066 | 132.43 | 0/0/0/100 | 68971.15/0 | 1 |
| Southern Federal District | 547.9 | 0.87 | 56.63 | 82/8/0/10 | 19568.9/0 | 6,69 |
| the Russian Federation | 2763.49 | 0.14 | 421.39 | 26/9,5/11/53.5 | 788562.73/110 | 7 |
