Analysis Of Relationship Between Communicative Attitudes And Adaptive Potential Of Disabled Youth
Table 2:
Distinction parameters | EG, average | CG, average | t empirical | Significance level |
Veiled cruelty | 10.5 | 10.5 | 0 | – |
Open cruelty | 11.2 | 13.1 | 2.3 | 0.05 |
Well-founded negativism | 2.6 | 2 | 1.9 | – |
Grumbling | 5.2 | 3.2 | 4.7 | 0.01 |
Bad experience | 9.2 | 4.9 | 6 | 0.01 |
Negative communicative attitude | 38.7 | 33.6 | 2.6 | 0.05 |