№ |
Potential effects |
Problems |
11 |
Attracting additional investment in the production sector of penal institutions |
Late payment for products by customers |
22 |
Achieving maximum employment of convicts in penal institutions |
Possible interruptions in orders for the production of products under short-term contracts |
33 |
Education of convicts sentenced to deprivation of liberty to professions in demand on the labor market |
Disruptions in the supply of raw materials for production. Increase in working capital |
44 |
Increasing the volume of manufactured and sold products |
The methodology for determining the cost of services has not been developed |
55 |
Market expansion |
Lack of systematic loading of production capacities of penal institutions |
66 |
Improving the efficiency of payments for claims of convicts |
Decrease in volumes of own production by penal institutions |
77 |
Capacity utilization |
Depreciation of own equipment with the loss of the possibility of updating it in the institutions of correctional system |
88 |
Involvement of idle production areas in the production cycle of penal institutions |
Violation of the shelf life of finished products |
99 |
Providing personal protective equipment and clothing for prisoners sentenced to imprisonment by counterparty |
Actual profitability of products manufactured under a tolling scheme may differ from that recommended by the order of the federal authorities of the penal system |
110 |
Highly qualified civilian counterparty’s personnel |
Decreased economic independence of the manufacturing sector of the penal institutions |
111 |
Reimbursement of expenses for the maintenance of prisoners |
|
112 |
Investments in penal institutions in the form of equipment, repair of buildings and structures |
|
113 |
Economic risk reduction |
|
114 |
Reducing the costs of maintaining production facilities, machine tools and equipment of penal institutions |
|