Abstract
A curriculum is the basis of any educational program. It contains a list of academic disciplines, the distribution of training time in semesters, types of training sessions (lectures, practical and laboratory classes) and types of control. Normative documents contain many conditions for these curriculum parameters which should be taken into consideration. Currently this problem is being successfully solved with the help of a special computer software which is the same for all universities in Russia. Curriculum developers manage the educational process by changing its structure, i.e. in this case the structural control is used. A structural control is a change in the object structure to achieve its goal. The structure reflects the system and consists of the elements and links between them. The structural control is accomplished by changing the elements or links. The mathematical model of the system contains the input actions, output actions and parameters. These components should be highlighted for control implementation. The structure of the educational program is formed based on two sets: input elements (knowledge) and output elements (competencies). The goal of the educational program is to transform the input elements into output competencies. To do this, each competency is divided into Modules. To control the educational program the links between the Elements are created which subsequently form Units, Modules and Competencies. Here one can apply the theory of fuzzy sets.
Keywords: Curriculumstructural controleducational program
Introduction
The Bachelor's and master's degree educational programs are the main ones at Russian universities. The Bachelor's degree educational programs are more complex and last for four years. As a result, the bachelor should receive basic general education and the possibility of further specialization (Bronov et al., 2019; Tonakiewicz-Kołosowska et al., 2016). The students are taught in the magistracy
Any educational program is created and carried out by a specific department. The department develops the curriculum, draws up a list of academic disciplines, distributes the teaching load among teachers, organizes the interaction with other departments, contacts the students, controls the creation of methodological support and the use of special technical means (for example, for laboratory classes), organizes practices, current monitoring, defence of Bachelor's qualification works and is fully responsible for the training quality.
Accreditation is the most important form of government control. During the accreditation a special commission carries out the examination of educational programs based on the documents prepared by the department. The educational program at the university must meet many regulatory requirements. These are the state laws, ministries' orders, the university methodological recommendations and the department wishes. To meet these requirements, the resources are used such as teachers and technical means; Teachers create training manuals and implement training using these manuals. Technical means are auxiliary and are used for the skills formation while assimilating the training material.
Problem Statement
The usable software helps to fulfil only the formal requirements related to the number of hours and their distribution by academic disciplines, weeks and semesters. Presently, the curriculum creators are developing its structure: they divide it into academic disciplines allocating hours for them by the training load type. As a result, an empty curriculum template is formed. Then this template is filled in with the names of academic disciplines. The curriculum developer determines their sequence based on his own experience and the previous curricula (Ramrathan, 2016). When a specific academic discipline is placed in a specific curriculum position, it has a link with other disciplines. Therefore, the same position in the curriculum can be associated with other positions depending on which disciplines are placed in the specific curriculum cells. Thus, the curriculum structure is created.
This structure affects the entire educational process as it provides a consistent study of the material and the formation of relevant competencies. Curriculum developers manage the educational process by changing its structure, i.e. in this case the structural control is used.
Research Questions
A curriculum is the basis of any educational program. It contains a list of academic disciplines, the distribution of training time in semesters, types of training sessions (lectures, seminars and laboratory classes) and types of control (Kukartsev et al., 2018; Lozitskaja et al., 2019; Mitchell, 2016).
Normative documents contain many conditions for these curriculum parameters which should be taken into consideration. Currently this problem is being successfully solved with the help of a special computer software which is the same for all universities in Russia. But the content of the curriculum is developed manually.
The purpose of an educational program is to transform the input competencies into output competencies. The problem is to form the structure of the educational program (Vainshtein et al., 2019; Vainshtein, 2018).
The control of the educational program consists of changing its structure to achieve the specified goal.
Design general structure of the educational program
A curriculum structure should be developed for the subsequent automation of its filling.
Design general principles of the structural control system
The educational program control is a change in the structure of the curriculum. It can be called «a structural control». The structural control is used in technical systems. It is proposed to use these principles to control the educational program.
Purpose of the Study
There are studies to develop a curriculum structure. Currently, the program «Plany» is used for the development. It solves the problem of the curriculum parameters calculating but excluding the content. With its help an empty curriculum structure is created. But it is advisable to design an educational program (and its curriculum) both taking into consideration the content of academic disciplines and the transformation of input competencies into output competencies (Zykova et al., 2018).
Research Methods
Structure of the educational program
A structural control is a change in the object structure to achieve its goal. The structure reflects the system and consists of the elements and links between them. The structural control is accomplished by changing the elements or links.
The mathematical model of the system contains the input actions, output actions and parameters. These components should be highlighted for control implementation.
Input actions are educational disciplines and their positions in the curriculum.
Output actions are formed competencies at the end of the educational process (Taryma et al., 2019).
Parameters are the content of academic disciplines, the types of training sessions associated with them (lectures, practical and laboratory classes) and the corresponding planned time.
The structural control is implemented by changing the input actions to obtain the desired output action and it has the following features (Drozd et al., 2019; Drozd & Kapulin, 2017; Kapulin & Russkikh, 2019; Zaharin, 2018).
The structural control does not provide an unambiguous link between each input and output action. It means that you cannot specify which input action needs to be changed to obtain the desired result.
Each academic discipline contains the material that is associated with other academic disciplines. A specific academic discipline is considered a fragment of the general sequence of the educational material. Therefore, when one discipline changes (or its position in the curriculum), other related disciplines (or their positions) are likely to have been changed.
The purpose of the structural control is the formation of predetermined competencies at the output. But competencies contain many components such as knowledge and skills. Each academic discipline is involved in the formation of the corresponding parts of different competencies. The unambiguous link between academic disciplines and competencies is not obvious.
The structural control is discrete – there is a limited set of states for input actions.
One of control options is to iterate through all possible control actions combinations and evaluate the obtained result. Then will be the choice of the best combination of input actions. However, it is required to select the criteria for comparing options. Here one can apply the theory of fuzzy sets. The structure of the educational program (figure
To do this, each competency is divided into Modules.
For example, the competence “the ability to develop a computer application program for a specific task” can be divided into the following Modules:
1) the algorithm development;
2) a software code development;
3) the program testing and debugging;
4) the program installation procedure development;
5) the development of the methodological support to work with the program.
Each Module is formed from a huge number of didactic Units, in particular:
1) the algorithm concept;
2) the syntax of the programming language;
3) the basic programming language constructs;
4) the execution of software documentation;
5) the structure of the operating system;
6) the principles of the operating system with the application programs’ interaction;
7) the ability to work with the specific programming language compiler;
8) the specific sections of discrete mathematics;
9) the mathematical logic;
10) the set theory;
11) operating the computer;
12) working in application programs, etc.
These units interact with each other and create the Modules that make up the competencies.
The system functions as a relational database. In this case, the Elements and Modules implement the «many-to-many» relationship. This relationship cannot be implemented directly in a relational database. Therefore, it is transformed into the sequence of relations (figure
“many-to-one” → “one-to-many” = “many-to-many”
To control the educational program the links between the Elements are created which subsequently form Units, Modules and Competencies.
The educational program developers have a large array of didactic Elements to use. Only a part of them is required for a specific educational program. To select the specific didactic Units chosen from them Competencies and Modules are analyzed.
For example, the part of the Elements (figure
Structural control system
A structural control is the control through the structural change. It is realized by selecting the links between Elements that form Units and then by selecting the links between the Units and the Modules that form the Competencies (figure
The Elements and links between them are selected taking into consideration the purpose of the educational program which is determined by its competencies. For this aim, the competencies are divided into the Modules. The Modules are formed from Elements and the links between them. There are many Elements and many valid links.
There is an input task for the
There are many limitations: a table of possible links between the elements. Other links are impossible. This can be used to automate the links formation. The table of possible links is formed manually based on the developers’ experience. Gradually it accumulates a large amount of options. Only appropriate options are used for the educational program with a specific set of competencies.
The pointer to the desired structure indicates the class of tasks to be solved. To do this, the tasks are classified according to various criteria: in particular, by the type of activity (in accordance with the educational standards): scientific work, technical development, operation, consulting, etc. To form the Units, fuzzy logic can be used. It means the following.
The indicator
Findings
The result of the study is a generalized structure of the educational program which is further reflected in the curriculum. The main provisions related to the structural control organization based on the detailed output competencies for the constituent elements are also formulated.
Conclusion
The proposed structural method to control the educational program allows to partially automate its development and proceed to the creating synthesis algorithms’ stage. However, it is required to clarify some aspects of the method and its practical implementation.
Acknowledgments
This work is a part of the joint research plan for the employees of Siberian Federal University (Krasnoyarsk), Krasnoyarsk State Agricultural University and Moscow State University of Technologies and Management named after Razumovsky.
References
- Anikyeva, M. A. (2019). Shkala urovnej osvoeniya uchebnoj informacii [Learning Information Mastering Scale]. In Informatizatsiya obrazovaniya i metodika elektronnogo obucheniya (pp. 20–25). Siber. Fed. Univer. [in Rus]
- Bronov, S., Stepanova, E., Pichkovskaya, S., Sheluhin, A., & Panikarova, N. (2019). Information technology in the educational program design. Journal of physics: Conference Series, 1399, 022005.
- Drozd, O. V., Russkikh, P. A., Chentsov, S. V., & Kapulin D. V. (2019). Structural-dynamic approach to the formalization of information exchange objects under integrated information environment. IOP Conference series: Materials science and engineering, 537, 032077.
- Drozd, O. V., & Kapulin, D. V. (2017). The model of electronic design document as a part of integrated information environment of radioelectronic enterprise. Dynamics of systems, mechanisms and machines, 2017, 1-5.
- Kapulin, D. V., & Russkikh, P. A. (2019). Organizatsiya interaktivnogo uchebnogo protsessa po distsipline «Berezhlivoye proizvodstvo i upravlenie kachestvom» [Organization of an interactive educational process in the discipline «Lean Production and Quality Management»]. In Informatizatsiya obrazovaniya i metodika elektronnogo obucheniya (pp. 133–138). Siber. Fed. Univer. [in Rus]
- Kukartsev, V. V., Chzhan, E. A., Tynchenko, V. S., Antamoshkin, O. A., & Stupina, A. A. (2018). Development of adaptive educational course in the SibFU E-learning system. J. of Siber. Fed. Univer. Humanities and Social Sci, 11(5), 740–752. https://doi.org/10.17516/1997-1370-0267
- Lozitskaja, E. V., Chzhan, E. A., Kukartsev, V. V., & Tynchenko, V. S. (2019). Automation of university curriculum construction using didactic unit arrays. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1353, 012131.
- Mitchell, B. (2016). Curriculum Construction and Implementation. Int. J. of Liberal Arts and Social Sci. 4(4).
- Ramrathan, L. (2016). Beyond counting the numbers: Shifting higher education transformation into curriculum spaces. Transformation in Higher Education, 1(1), 1–8.
- Taryma, A. K., Shershneva, V. A., & Vainshtein, Y. V. (2019). Development of professional ICT competence for future teachers of the Tuva republic under the conditions of bilingualism. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovania, 4, 77–90. [in Rus]
- Tonakiewicz-Kołosowska, A., Socik, I., & Gajewska, M. (2016) Information competencies and their implementation in the educational process of polish universities exploratory. International Conference e-Learning, 223–226.
- Vainshtein, I. V., Shershneva, V. A., Esin, R. V., & Noskov, M. V. (2019) Individualisation of education in terms of e-learning: experience and prospects. Journal of siberian federal university: Humanities and social sciences, 9, 1753–1770.
- Vainshtein, Y. V. (2018) Sovremenniye podhody k pesonalizatsii elektronnogo obucheniya [Modern approaches to personalization of e-learning]. In Informatizatsiya obrazovaniya i metodika elektronnogo obucheniya (pp. 50–55). Siber. Fed. Univer. [in Rus]
- Zaharin, K. N. (2018) Rol' uchebnih ob'ektov v postroenii adaptivnogo uchebnogo protsessa [The role of educational objects in building an adaptive educational process]. In Informatizatsiya obrazovaniya i metodika elektronnogo obucheniya (pp. 163–167). Siber. Fed. Univer. [in Rus]
- Zykova, T. V., Shershneva, V. A., Vainshtein, Y. V., Danilenko, A. S., & Kytmanov, A. A. (2018) E-learning courses in mathematics in higher education. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovania, 4, 58–65. [in Rus]
Copyright information
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
About this article
Publication Date
21 October 2020
Article Doi
eBook ISBN
978-1-80296-089-1
Publisher
European Publisher
Volume
90
Print ISBN (optional)
-
Edition Number
1st Edition
Pages
1-1677
Subjects
Economics, social trends, sustainability, modern society, behavioural sciences, education
Cite this article as:
Bronov, S. A., Stepanova, E. A., Panikarova, N. F., & Pichkovskaya, S. Y. (2020). Structural Control Of The Educational Program Based On Information Technology. In I. V. Kovalev, A. A. Voroshilova, G. Herwig, U. Umbetov, A. S. Budagov, & Y. Y. Bocharova (Eds.), Economic and Social Trends for Sustainability of Modern Society (ICEST 2020), vol 90. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 286-293). European Publisher. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.10.03.33