It Is? It Is Not? Identifying Portulaca by Morphology and DNA Barcodes
Table 2:
Loci |
Sample |
Best hit species |
Total score |
Query Cover |
E value |
Identity |
trnL-trnF |
PO1 |
P. oleracea |
1646 |
100% |
0.0 |
99.89% |
trnL-trnF |
PO2 |
P. oleracea |
1700 |
100% |
0.0 |
100.00% |
trnL-trnF |
PO3 |
Portulaca sp. |
1273 |
100% |
0.0 |
93.89% |
rbcl |
PO2 |
P. oleracea |
900 |
100% |
0.0 |
99.80% |
rbcl |
PO3 |
P. oleracea |
898 |
100% |
0.0 |
99.80% |
ITS1 |
PO1 |
P. oleracea |
628 |
97% |
3e-176 |
98.07% |
ITS1 |
PO2 |
P. oleracea |
641 |
97% |
4e-180 |
98.62% |
ITS1 |
PO3 |
P. oleracea |
630 |
97% |
9e-177 |
98.08% |
ITS2 |
PO1 |
P. oleraceae |
819 |
100% |
0.0 |
99.78% |
ITS2 |
PO2 |
P. oleraceae |
848 |
100% |
0.0 |
99.57% |
ITS2 |
PO3 |
P. oleraceae |
854 |
100% |
0.0 |
99.57% |
< Back to article