European Proceedings Logo

Energy-Economic Assessment Of Improved Fodder Crop Rotations In The Novgorod Region

Table 3:

Indicator Unit of measurement Crop
lupine winter rye barley oat
Crop rotation № 1
Crop yield t k units / ha 9.7* 6.6 5.4 3.8
Specific Energy Intensity k J t к . u n i t . 2.2 1.8 2.2 3.9
Profitability % - 81.0 35.0 58.0
Energy efficiency coefficient units - 8.6 4.4 5.4
Crop rotation № 2
Crop yield t k units / ha 9.3 5.4 5.0 3.7
Specific Energy Intensity k J t к . u n i t . 2.6 1.71 24.0 4.0
Profitability % 11.0 61.0 21.0 46.0
Energy efficiency coefficient units 6.6 7.9 3.9 5.0
Crop
oat + clover clover of the 1st year of use winter rye barley
Crop rotation № 3
Crop yield t k units / ha 3.9 10.7* 7.3 6.5
Specific Energy Intensity k J t к . u n i t . 3.2 0.9 1.6 2.0
Profitability % 52.0 - 98.0 93.0
Energy efficiency coefficient units 6.0 - 9.4 7.1
Crop rotation № 4
Crop yield t k units / ha 3.5 8.6 6.3 5.1
Specific Energy Intensity k J t к . u n i t . 3.7 1.0 1.8 2.6
Profitability % 35.0 68.0 71.0 53.0
Energy efficiency coefficient units 5.3 18.0 8.4 5.6
Crop
barley + perennial grasses perennial grasses of the first year of use perennial grasses of the second year of use on s/ m, 2 mowing for green manure oat
Crop rotation № 5
Crop yield t k units / ha 4.8 11.2 10.9 4.5
Specific Energy Intensity k J t к . u n i t . 2.2 1.0 1.0 3.3
Profitability % 41.0 61.0 95.0 73.8
Energy efficiency coefficient units 6.0 19.2 17.9 6.0
< Back to article