Abstract
This article tackles the new methods in teaching English for Specific Purposes, which deals with the specific communicative needs of individuals or groups of individuals. Throughout the last decades, ESP has become one of the most prominent areas of Teaching English as a Foreign Language. A series of innovative ideas have influenced ESP: critical approaches, social constructivism and discourse analysis. Certain aspects such as collaborative approaches, communication and discourse variation should be given the proper attention. New ESP approaches focus on the importance of what the individuals study and give them the opportunity to use English in order to acquire even more information, as their interest in their domain will motivate them to interact more with other speakers. This paper compares and contrasts the modern trends in ESP teaching which put emphasis on communicative situations, needs analysis and a more practical approach of the discourse. ESP contains an increasing number of specific terms, especially customized to fit a wide range of jobs connected to the ESP domain. There are two major factors: the phenomenon of globalisation and the increasing mobility of the world’s workforce, that will cause an increasing demand for specialized register English courses. In addition to this, the economies of the emergent countries will be in high demand of workers who have a good command of English as a second language, especially for the workforce of transnational corporations, therefore a good command of English for Specific Purposes is desirable.
Keywords: Theoretical foundationinteractionapproachneedscommunication
Introduction
According to the most recent studies, English is the most widely spoken language worldwide, with approximately 380 million native speakers and 1.12 billion speakers as a second language. It is understandable why English is referred to as
One essential constituent of teaching English nowadays is represented by English for Specific Purposes, or ESP for short. This component has been referred to as
English for Specific Purposes refers to the study of language, discourse, contexts of use and the direct application of these discoveries to the practical domains. This is what basically makes the difference between ESP and General English. In a more recent article it is stated that:
Unlike other pedagogical approaches, which may be less specific needs-based and more theory-driven, ESP pedagogy places heavy demands on its practitioners to collect empirical needs-assessments data, to create or to adapt materials to meet specific needs identified and to cope with often unfamiliar matter and even language use (Belcher, 2004, p.31).
ESP can be described as a mixture of methods, strategies and techniques whose main goal is to offer a perspective over the content of the specialized register. Still, native speakers of English will have to accept accomodative techniques in their own interpersonal interactions with non-native speakers of English.
Problem Statement
The problem that arises is: what makes English for Specific Purposes so special and what is that makes the difference between ESP and General English? Hutchinson was asked:
ESP has several features, as defined by some researchers (Dudley-Evans, 2001, p.18):
customized to meet the specific needs of the learners;
goal-directed;
based on analysis of needs;
refers strictly to the activities of the specific register that it deals with;
centered not only on linguistic issues, such as grammar or vocabulary, but also focused on the skills required by the technical domain in which English is to be used;
ESP students participate in intercultural communication and the development of intercultural competence.
Other studies (Robinson, 1991, p. 53), classified ESP in two categories: EAP (English for Academic Purposes) and EOP (English for Occupational Purposes). There is also a series of subcategories of EOP, such as
People can work and study simultaneously; it is also likely that in many cases the language learnt for immediate use in a study environment will be used later when the student takes up or returns to a job.
There seems to be general agreement that ESP teachers do not necessarily need expertise in a specific technical domain. Yet, they are required to meet two basic conditions: awareness and feel for a specific technical registry. Bell indicated the three C’s to help ESP teachers enhance their knowledge and skills in a specific field of ESP: (Table
Curiosity – the ESP teachers should be interested in the subject area and want to learn more about specific topics;
Collaboration – ESP teachers should ask for feedback from specialists;
Confidence – will grow as ESP teachers are willing to analyze a new subject area. (Bell. 2002, p. 83)
Until recently, ESP courses were customized for intermediate or advanced adult learners. Nowadays, things have changed: most students begin practising academic or vocational English in middle school. This is because today ESP may be related to or designed for specific disciplines. In specific teaching situations, ESP may use a different methodology from the one used in General English, as long as it is in the learner’s best interest.
Harding stressed the fact that general skills, such as those considered as applicable to General English, e.g. ability to communicate, pragmatism or use of authentic materials, are also suitable for ESP classes (Harding, 2007, p.47). Specifically, there is no need for ESP teachers to follow a course book strictly. They should consider their students’ needs and comprehend the nature of their subject domain. ESP teachers should also identify students’ language needs in relation to their area of interest.
Other aspects deal with the use of situations or texts from students’ domain of interest, authenticity or the use of authentic materials so that students are motivated to interact in a proactive way and to understand the content of ESP classes.
One important aspect of a suitable ESP class development is the teachers’ assumptions on the teaching stages that will be used as the foundation which later ESP classes will be developed on. As a consequence, these stages will give an appropriate outlook on the theoretical background and they will help decide upon the most correct methodology that should be applied. Needless to say, all assumptions made should take into consideration the specificity of each learner.
Research Questions
To understand the internal mechanism of ESP elaboration techniques, we need to ask ourselves which are the structures that form ESP and to recall the very beginning of ESP development approaches. Up to a point, they focused mainly on vocabulary, grammar and syntactical characteristics. In other words, they did nothing but follow the trends of that time. But it seemed that this particular kind of approach was going to no result, so specialists decided to put more emphasis on a more communicative and pragmatic basis. Therefore, more recent outlooks on cognitive studies have provided a more appropriate framework to apply the cognitive strategies that students use in order to acquire ESP notional content.
Five decades ago, Halliday, McIntosh and Strevens (1964) introduced the concept of
Bernard Barber (1962) had an important contribution to the design of ESP methodology, as his research focused on lexicolinguistics and structuralism. Herbert’s
Purpose of the Study
The purpose of the present study is to identify which methods would be the most viable in teaching ESP courses. We should start from the premises that students have already acquired notional content specific to the National Curriculum during their previous stages of education, hence the material to be presented in ESP classes should be graded in length and complexity. For example, some possible resources for technical texts might be textbooks, professional papers and articles, scientific dictionaries or even websites of transnational corporations. A principal criterion of selection can be represented by elements such as frequency or range, whilst others can be included for reasons such as their usefulness as describers or definers.
Research Methods
In the early steps of ESP development, traditional methods focused on language at the sentence level, whereas in the later stages, modern methods shifted the emphasis to the level above the sentence, analysing the way the combinations of sentences and phrases serve the speaker’s purpose. At this stage, it is important to understand how specific linguistic features influence the type of statement made in each case and how these issues are combined in order to become understandable at a certain stage. Still, there have been debates on the specific features used in General English compared to ESP. For example, one could think of tense choice depending on the notion of time in General English, whereas in ESP they depend on the degree of generality. Researchers have tried to identify the organizational patterns in texts and the linguistic realisations by which tense patterns are used in ESP.
Paragraphs can be classified in two major types: the physical and the conceptual type (Trimble 1985, p. 38). Physical paragraphs are important up to a point, whereas conceptual ones contain general informative notions. Using specific rhetorical techniques, these notions can be combined into chunks of information within ESP discourse, according to several criteria: time, space, causality and result. Trimble’s method has been closely related to Mann and Thomson’s theories on rhetorical structures. Their opinion led to a choice of teaching materials based on discourse approach. This proved useful for students to recognize textual patterns and discourse markers.
Most papers on ESP can be divided in three categories:
1. Discussion papers related to the process of teaching, e.g.
2. Papers that deal with the National Curricula, e.g. How to Arm Your Students: A Consideration of Two Approaches to Providing Materials for ESP by Phillips and Shettlesworth or Further Notes on Developing an English Programme for Students of Science and Technology by Ewer and Hughes-Davies (1971);
3. Papers containing mainly useful teaching materials and methodological hints e.g.
Most of these researchers have managed to demonstrate that there is a close relationship between research and methodology and they should be studied as a whole rather than considering them separate notions. This would be the starting point of a new approach, that is considering the student as the central axis of the needs and wants analysis process.
Findings
In the early steps of ESP development, traditional methods focused on language at the sentence level, whereas in the later stages, modern methods shifted the emphasis to the level above the sentence, analysing the way the combinations of sentences and phrases serve the speaker’s purpose. At this stage, it is important to understand how specific linguistic features influence the type of statement made in each case and how these issues are combined in order to become understandable at a certain stage. Still, there have been debates on the specific features used in General English compared to ESP. For example, one could think of tense choice depending on the notion of time in General English, whereas in ESP they depend on the degree of generality. Researchers have tried to identify the organizational patterns in texts and the linguistic realisations by which tense patterns are used in ESP.
Paragraphs can be classified in two major types: the physical and the conceptual type (Trimble, 1985, p. 38). Physical paragraphs are important up to a point, whereas conceptual ones contain general informative notions. Using specific rhetorical techniques, these notions can be combined into chunks of information within ESP discourse, according to several criteria: time, space, causality and result. Trimble’s method has been closely related to Mann and Thomson’s theories on rhetorical structures. Their opinion led to a choice of teaching materials based on discourse approach. This proved useful for students to recognize textual patterns and discourse markers.
Most papers on ESP can be divided in three categories:
1. Discussion papers related to the process of teaching, e.g.
2. Papers that deal with the National Curricula, e.g. How to Arm Your Students: A Consideration of Two Approaches to Providing Materials for ESP by Phillips and Shettlesworth or Further Notes on Developing an English Programme for Students of Science and Technology by Ewer and Hughes-Davies (1971);
3. Papers containing mainly useful teaching materials and methodological hints e.g.
Most of these researchers have managed to demonstrate that there is a close relationship between research and methodology and they should be studied as a whole rather than considering them separate notions. This would be the starting point of a new approach, that is considering the student as the central axis of the needs and wants analysis process.
Conclusion
To conclude, judging by the various aspects and approaches identified so far, we consider that ESP will be exposed to a continuous influence of several factors and trends. There is no doubt that ESP research and practice will boost interest in ESP in geographical areas where an increase in specialisation of ESP courses is highly required.
However, there seems to be a small delay between the rapid growth of ESP courses and the research in this domain. Hopefully, the development of ESP courses will determine an emphasis on innovation in the field of ESP research. In addition to this, areas of theory that have had a systematic influence on the development of ESP appear to have the same beneficial impact on ESP in the years to come.
It is our belief that learners will become more aware of the importance of ESP and understand that English has a major social component as a means of communication. If a personal opinion in allowed, then we consider that the ever-increasing use of English as a means of communication in interpersonal relationships between native and non-native speakers of English is likely to have a major impact and it will probably trigger an even more extended use of ESP programmes throughout the world.
References
- Anthony, L. (2005). Corpus Wars: Struggling to Find New Ways to Analyze and Teach Vocabulary. Strathclyde, UK: University of Strathclyde Press.
- Barber, B. (1962). Science and the Social Order. Rev. ed. (New York: Collier Books).
- Belcher, D. (2004). Trends in Teaching English for Specific Purposes. Annual review of Applied Linguistics. 24, 165-186.
- Bell, D. (2002). Help! I've been asked to teach a class on ESP! in: IATEFL Voices, 169, Oct/Nov.
- Dudley-Evans, T. (2001). English for Specific Purposes in The Cambridge Guide to TESOL. Cambridge University Press.
- Ewer, J., Lattore, G. (1969). A Course in Basic Scientific English. London: Longman.
- Ewer, J. R., & Hughes-Davies, E. (1971). Further notes on developing an ELT program for students of science and technology. ELT Journal, 26(1), 65-70.
- Halliday, M., A., K., McIntosh, A. & Strevens, P. (1964). The Linguistic sciences and language teaching. (Longmans' Linguistic Library.) London: Longman.
- Hutchinson T., Waters A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Harding, K., (2007). English for Specific Purposes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Robinson, P. C., (1991). ESP today: A practitioner’s guide. Hemel Hempstead: Phoenix
- Swales, J. (1977). Episodes in ESP. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
- Trimble, L. (1985). English for Science and Technology. A Discourse Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Copyright information
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
About this article
Publication Date
15 August 2019
Article Doi
eBook ISBN
978-1-80296-066-2
Publisher
Future Academy
Volume
67
Print ISBN (optional)
-
Edition Number
1st Edition
Pages
1-2235
Subjects
Educational strategies,teacher education, educational policy, organization of education, management of education, teacher training
Cite this article as:
Buşu*, A. (2019). An Outlook On Modernism In Teaching English For Specific Purposes. In E. Soare, & C. Langa (Eds.), Education Facing Contemporary World Issues, vol 67. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 1759-1765). Future Academy. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.08.03.216