The Effect Of Team Cohesion On Peer Justice: A Team-Level Analysis
Table 4:
Hyp. | Path | Group 1: Female | Group 2: Male | Female Leader vs. Male Leader | Results | ||||
PathCoef. (1) | SE(1) | Path Coef. (2) | SE (2) | |Path Coef.(1)- Path Coef. (2)| | T Value | P Value | |||
H2a | TC->PPJ | 0.809 | 0.055 | 0.669 | 0.114 | 0.140 | 0.873 | 0.386 | Rejected |
H2b | TC->PIJ | 0.579 | 0.096 | 0.547 | 0.107 | 0.031 | 0.195 | 0.846 | Rejected |
H2c | TC->PINFJ | 0.519 | 0.248 | 0.781 | 0.052 | 0.262 | 1.380 | 0.172 | Rejected |
N= | 23 | 43 | |||||||
Group 1: Production | Group 2: Service | Production vs. Service | |||||||
H3a | TC->PPJ | 0.781 | 0.083 | 0.760 | 0.062 | 0.021 | 0.207 | 0.837 | Rejected |
H3b | TC->PIJ | 0.556 | 0.136 | 0.707 | 0.066 | 0.151 | 1.048 | 0.298 | Rejected |
H3c | TC->PINFJ | 0.814 | 0.057 | 0.766 | 0.058 | 0.048 | 0.597 | 0.553 | Rejected |
N= | 31 | 35 |