Hypothesis |
Relationship |
Path coefficient (β) |
Results |
H1 |
Emotional appeal → Quantitative performance |
-.10 |
Not Supported |
H2 |
Vision and leadership → Quantitative performance |
.19* |
Supported |
H3 |
Social responsibility → Quantitative performance |
.01 |
Not Supported |
H4 |
Workplace environment → Quantitative performance |
.22** |
Supported |
H5 |
Financial performance → Quantitative performance |
.44** |
Supported |
H6 |
Product and services→ Quantitative performance |
.19* |
Supported |
H7 |
Emotional appeal → Qualititative performance |
.01 |
Not Supported |
H8 |
Financial performance → Qualiitative performance |
.10 |
Not Supported |
H9 |
Vision and leadership → Qualititative performance |
.16* |
Supported |
H10 |
Social responsibility → Qualititative performance |
.14 |
Not Supported |
H11 |
Workplace environment → Qualititative performance |
.25** |
Supported |
H12 |
Product and services→ Qualititative performance |
.24** |
Supported |
Fit measures |
Endogenous construct |
Final model |
R2 |
|
|
|
Quantitative performance |
0,381 |
|
Qualitative performance |
0,601 |