Abstract
Correspondence between actions of three social technologies is discovered – bioethics, urban planning and knowledge management. The correspondence is discovered on basis of the "paradox of ignoramus". The essence of paradox is the fate of ignoramus guaranteed to everyone in the society of knowledge. The paradox manifests the situation in which each professional becomes an expert in a single area of knowledge while staying helpless as an ignoramus in all the rest areas, but living in modern society requires a special awareness to navigate in a complex reality. These three technologies protect an ignoramus: knowledge management protects the intellectual freedom of specialist; urban planning – the rights of urban communities; bioethics – individuality. On basis of information models, the task of knowledge management in urban planning is specified and a role of verbal symbolism of bioethics in finding the "semiotic attractor" of urban planning was established. This symbolism serves as the fostering of needs and recodes the pragmatics of social egoism into the pragmatist of social altruism. Such change in symbolism's pragmatics causes the positive self-organization of urban community, which is the object of urbanistic theories. The structure of urban space is interpreted as localization of the spectrum of processes each if which is examined in separate trends of urbanism. These processes are interpreted as information processes that allowed one to uncover invariants in urban space, under which conditions of the unacceptable effects of urban planning (equifinality and heterotopy) and the limits of concepts' applicability are manifested.
Keywords: Bioethics' symbolismurban planningsemiotic attractorequifinalityheterotopyparadox of ignoramus
Introduction
So far, in the research, no correspondence between bioethics and urban planning has been revealed. These two young disciplines have some points in common. Until the 20 the century, their object was shaped spontaneously as ethical regulation of healing and similarity of settlement processes. Subsequently they turned into interdisciplinary fields of knowledge unifying the sciences far from each other – medicine and ethics, architecture and urban economics. Then these sciences acquired a value of social institutions: organizing ethical committees and advocacy planning (Davidoff, Davidoff & Gold, 1970) which protect the rights of those who are not aware they have rights to live in accordance with their ideas about everyday life they want. Herewith, this protection is originated not in modification of legislation, but initiate its modification by the very fact of its existence. And in this case, a phenomenon that one would call the paradox of ignoramus emerges. The paradox consists in the fact that the modern interdisciplinary integration and distribution of knowledge in the era of convergent technologies force each professional to be ignoramus within the entire integrated field of knowledge. Besides the enforcement of the integration results in growing profanation of professionals. In other words, the more researching and practical experience each professional gets, the more ignoramus one becomes within other limits of interdisciplinary field because all of its other loci are developed with increasing speed (Ardashkin, 2015; Ardashkin, Martyushev & Bezborodov, 2015; Ardashkin, Bykov & Kirsanova, 2016). This paradox makes clearer the state of a human being who becomes an ignoramus, and probably because of this, bioethics took the special place in a modern science and transformed into a mean of protecting the right of any individuality to be oneself, not obeying the dictates of traditions, stereotypes and images of social dream. That is all that in all times was embodied by architecture and in its changeability left traces in the urban space. Planning of urban space is based on urbanist theory that is interdisciplinary and affects the interests of knowledge areas that are far from each other: architecture, culturology and ecology; economics, sociology and jurisprudence; a range of technical sciences (Abu-Lughod, Castells & Rondinelli, 1984; Adams, 2017; Harvey, 2012; Harvey, 2006; Harvey, 2008; Mulligan, 2014 Sharp, 2013; Sennett, 2012; Soja, 2000). Besides, an architect and an ecologist see the goal of planning in forming the future space of city, an economist and a sociologist – in the short term, while a culturologist – in preserving the past. The situation is featured with the circumstance economists hardly understand how planning itself may be a negative factor in the cost of environment, and architects (as well as other professionals) do not pay particular attention to the economic consequences of their projects. This generates the most evident difficulty – the problem of equivocation because synonymous terms have different meanings in the listed fields of knowledge. Solutions of interdisciplinary problems may be found at the base of searching the points of unification applied to all the professionals. They all understand that city is a self-organizing system, their vocational training suppose their awareness in the field of informatics and proficiency in building conceptual models. These unifying foundations are the key ones in the information-synergetic approach developed by the authors and designed to conduct interdisciplinary research using a conceptual model (Fig.
![The model of an information stream](https://www.europeanproceedings.com/files/data/article/83/2688/icRPTSS2017FA102.fig.001.jpg)
Problem Statement
The primary problem is the lack of unity regarding the understanding of role of the invariant and the variable in transformations of a city in the urban theory, vector or scalar nature of city's dynamics, relationship between the objectives of urban planning and urban justice, or “the Right to the City” (Harvey, 2012; Sharp, 2013). This actualizes the development of the method of juxtaposing concepts that are in methodological opposition to each other. This method is necessary to overcome the situation, which the authors called the "paradox of ignoramus".
Research Questions
These problems cause two questions, the answers to which contribute to searching for solutions in this cognitive situation. The authors give them in concise formulations, the explanations to which will be given below: (1) Is the invariant structure of urban space a property of equifinality or is this structure an attractor of self-organization of those artificial habitats that people created in contrast with the natural environment? (2) Are the changes in a city an effect of heterotopy?
The authors intentionally do not use the terminology of urban theory to pose the questions, but address general scientific concepts, which eliminates the problem of the multivalued lexicon used in this interdisciplinary field. The questions concern the understanding of a role of the invariant and the variable in city's transformations. It is believed that a city retained the main features of its structure, constantly changing its appearance. The structure is formed by zones of urban space, which invariability is demonstrated by its reproduction in the “global city” called the Internet that was repeatedly emphasized by leading researchers of city and modern communication space. At the same time, the first question is also related to uncovering the mechanism ensuring the stability of urban space structure, in order to demarcate the vector and scalar parameters of city dynamics. One would explain that the interpretation of goal as an attractor implies the vector nature of dynamics, and equifinality corresponds to description of dynamics in the scalar values. In other words, the first question is whether the structure of city is invariant forever or is it an intermediate stage in the dynamics of this artificial system. If the first question is related to the invariable characteristics of urban space, then the second question regards the nature of changes.
Purpose of the Study
The stated problems and raised questions define the goal of this research, which is searching for their methodological solution for knowledge management and structuring the substance of education in the field of urban planning. Reaching the goal supposes the development of such methodology of juxtaposing the different schools, research trends and concepts that will be based on the principle "all are right", but at the same time it will allow one to determine their limits of applicability.
Research Methods
The information-synergetic approach (Melik-Gaykazyan et al, 2017) contains a range of procedures handling the modeling of socio-cultural dynamics, allows one to join the spectrum of established methods of humanitarian research (hermeneutic, semiotic, system, phenomenological). It is based at relationship of several theses among which four are important for the given research and are not trivial: 1) socio-cultural systems are self-organizing systems and that is why their research should be based at the methods of nonlinear dynamics; 2) information processes are the mechanisms of self-organization of socio-cultural systems; 3) information processes consist of independent stages-processes, and the initial conditions of each stage are created by result of the previous stage; 4) the creation of a semiotic form is the result of each stage. Within the framework of this approach, the models of information processes have been developed, which become research procedures for finding solutions in interdisciplinary fields of science. The essence of these procedures is to present a set of phases of the functioning of the studied system in a visualized model. At that, each phase is an object of research of a separate discipline, and, therefore, these procedures are to indicate the limits of applicability of results of scientific directions and concepts included in the interdisciplinary association. Addressing to schemes of information processes justifies the fact the urban planning differs from urban building drastically. The object of this science is not houses but neighborhood, not a layout of streets, but a configuration of urban communities, that is, communication of people. And any communications are a particular case of information processes.
Findings
The information-synergetic approach allows one to see the urban space as a localization of the semiotic results of multiple processes. These processes have the information essence, and the irreversible change of information stages allows one to understand what is happening in the structure of urban communities in both kinetics and spatial dynamics.
![Model of development of culture's forms and functions as results of
information processes in social systems](https://www.europeanproceedings.com/files/data/article/83/2688/icRPTSS2017FA102.fig.002.jpg)
All the mentioned-above is depicted by arrows on dashed lines directed towards a "Human being as a recipient of information". Arrows, pointing the opposite direction, depict ways of impacts on the fragments of social reality. The first target for "rulers and rebels" (Harvey, 2012) will be ideology, its slogans and myths, because namely their transformation dictates the further transformation of the whole reality. The model allows one to see that the weapon for defeating these targets is symbolism (block 7) since it is precisely the thing which initiates the operation of a critical function. However, the modification of symbols and styles is the result of social scenarios. An example of these scenarios is a lifestyle. For example, the emergence of a significant portion of people with a free work schedule, i.e. not participating in work-house pendulum migrations, can make the existing system of transport communications inefficient. Increase in a number of rentiers leads to the same effect. The critical function at work is expressed in emerging volunteer movements not including "rulers and rebels", but changing the lifestyle of "city streets". Initiatives of volunteers bring innovations (Gorbuleva, Melik-Gaykazyan & Melik-Gaykazyan, 2016) to "the right to the city" without addressing transformation of the normative function but prompting the need to make adjustments to ideological foundations in society. The Hansa serves as a historical example of medieval cities' coalition for trading purposes, which obtained special legal preferences from kings of different states that existed for more than a century. The emergence and flourishing of Hansa occurred in times of stable ideology while merchants were treated as a very suspicious stratum. Trade flows and strongholds of Hansa are the prototype of a "global city" in the days of the Internet and internet communities still have not lose their marginal status. In other words, the emergence of new community (for example, volunteers or merchants) can create a virtual urban space, which is able to take its place in the strata of actual urban space eventually. The power of the symbol is illustrated by another example. Zones of the city (acropolis, agora, theater, etc.) dictated the manner of behavior within their borders in the ancient city. It can be said that the semantics of place and the clarity of syntactics dictated the pragmatics. Physically, much of this stay intact so far, but the transformation of pragmatics occurs, and it is not a place that dictates the manner of behavior but gustatory preferences determine the life of these places (Hutchby, 2014). So, the symbol becomes the operator of social action, when it changes its pragmatics. This is demonstrated by innovations, which have become noticeable and habitual in the most cities of the world in recent years. These innovations are ramps, elevators, etc., which are designed for people who were first called invalids, and then – disabled people. Recently, these people are treated in a different way. From disabled people they became people with additional needs. This change is the result of bioethics' efforts, whose initiatives are aimed at protecting the right of individuality to be any. This manifests the symbolism of bioethics at the verbal level, creating the conditions for transforming of pragmatic component of that operator, which can find a way to a "semiotic attractor". The authors emphasize that this manifesting of bioethics' symbolism corresponds to block 3 (Fig.
Conclusion
An invariant structure is detected in urban space. It is a result of action of information processes, which are the mechanism of self-organization of sociocultural systems in all their diversity. This conceptual position ensured uncovering the conditions that cause undesirable consequences of urban planning that can be reduced to effects of equifinality and heterotopy, and allowed one to combine the opposing concepts of urbanism by the limits of their applicability. The result is relevant for development of a knowledge management strategy that is able to overcome the "paradox of ignoramus". This paradox creates difficulties for all interdisciplinary areas of knowledge, which are social technologies and are based on developing theories. The tasks of this management are specified: to carry out such communication between specialists, in which they do not have to leave the "native" conceptual limits; in organization of permanent education to update the content of training for specialists in dynamic areas of social technology; to construct a communication goal that is capable to a point at a "semiotic attractor", i.e. a strategy capable to invoke (or not suppressing) striving of a self-organizing system for an asymptotic goal. This goal is given by bioethics, for example, in replacing “disable people” with “people with additional needs”. The verbal symbolism of bioethics serves the fostering of needs meeting the ideals of social altruism, which is in high demand in consumer society and serves the fostering of individual responsibility for the consequences of choice, because bioethics addresses its initiatives not to communities, like urban planning does, but to individuals.
Acknowledgments
The results were obtained in the frameworks of RHF (RFBR) project №15-03-00598 and project № 35.5601.2017 of the State assignment for "Tomsk State Pedagogical University".
References
- Abu-Lughod, J., Castells, M., & Rondinelli, D. A. (1984). The City and the Grassroots: A Cross-Cultural Theory of Urban Social Movements. Edward Arnold, London.
- Adams, P. C. (2017). Geographies of media and communication II: Arcs of communication. Progress in Human Geography, 0309132517702992.
- Ardashkin, I. B. (2015). Philosophy of education as a social development factor: World trends and prospects for Russia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166, 277-286.
- Ardashkin, I. B., Martyushev, N. V., & Bezborodov, V. P. (2015). Problem methodology as one of the ways of innovative organization of educational process. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166, 227-231.
- Ardashkin, I., Bykov, A., & Kirsanova, E. (2016). The status of world outlook and environmental competencies in aerospace engineering training: the general and special. In MATEC Web of Conferences, 48, 06004.
- Brenner, N., & Schmid, C. (2014). The ‘urban age’ in question. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(3), 731-755.
- Davidoff, P., Davidoff, L., & Gold, N. N. (1970). Suburban action: advocate planning for an open society. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 36(1), 12-21.
- Fine, G. A. (2014). The Hinge Civil Society, Group Culture, and the Interaction Order. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77(1), 5-26.
- Galonnier, J. (2015). The Enclave, The Citadel and the Ghetto. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(1), 92-111.
- Gorbuleva, M. S., Melik-Gaykazyan, I., & Melik-Gaykazyan, M. (2016). Why do Russian defenders of animals operate so? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 4, 157-158.
- Harvey, D. (2006). Space of global capitalism. Towards a Theory of Uneven Geographical Development. L.: Verso.
- Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. The City Reader, 6, 23-40.
- Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. Verso Books.
- Hutchby, I. (2014). Communicative affordances and participation frameworks in mediated interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 72, 86-89.
- Kipfer, S., Saberi, P., & Wieditz, T. (2013). Henri Lefebvre: Debates and controversies1. Progress in Human Geography, 37(1), 115-134.
- McKenna, B. (2016). The Predatory Pedagogy of “Distance Learning”: Face-to-Face Education in Peril. Anthropology Now, 8(3), 71-80.
- Melik-Gaykazyan, I. V., Tarasenko, V. F., Mescheryakova, T. V., & Melik-Gaykazyan, M. V. (2017). Information model for management in the area of convergent technologies. In 29th International Business Information Management Association Conference-Innovation Management and Education Excellence Vision 2020: From Regional Development Sustainability to Global Economic Growth, IBIMA 2017, 429434.
- Mulligan, G. (2014). Regional science at sixty: traditional topics and new directions. Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 20(1), 4, 6-67.
- Okulicz-Kozaryn, A., & Mazelis, J. M. (2016). Urbanism and happiness: A test of Wirth’s theory of urban life. Urban Studies, 0042098016645470.
- Phillips, R., Evans, B., & Muirhead, S. (2015). Curiosity, place and wellbeing: encouraging place-specific curiosity as a ‘way to wellbeing’. Environment and Planning A, 47(11), 2339-2354.
- Sennett, R. (2012). Together: The rituals, pleasures and politics of cooperation. Yale University Press.
- Soja, E. W. (2000). Postmetropolis Critical studies of cities and regions.
- Soja, E. (2015). Accentuate the regional. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(2), 372-381.
- Sharp, D. (2013). Street Life: Rebels, Rulers, and the Right to the City. Arab Studies Journal, 21(1), 279.
- Woo, Y., & Webster, C. (2014). Co-evolution of gated communities and local public goods. Urban Studies, 51(12), 2539-2554.
Copyright information
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
About this article
Publication Date
19 February 2018
Article Doi
eBook ISBN
978-1-80296-034-1
Publisher
Future Academy
Volume
35
Print ISBN (optional)
-
Edition Number
1st Edition
Pages
1-1452
Subjects
Business, business innovation, science, technology, society, organizational behaviour, behaviour behaviour
Cite this article as:
Gaykazyan, I. V. M., & Gaykazyan, M. V. M. (2018). Paradox Of Ignoramus: Bioethics Symbolism In Planning Urban Space. In I. B. Ardashkin, N. V. Martyushev, S. V. Klyagin, E. V. Barkova, A. R. Massalimova, & V. N. Syrov (Eds.), Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences, vol 35. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 861-870). Future Academy. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2018.02.102