Innovative Components for Preparing Graduates and Masters Degree Holders of Natural Sciences, for Education at the University Level

Abstract

Professional and pedagogical activities in the new socio-economic conditions, based on accepted science view of expert activities, and professional development of individuals have been investigated. The distribution model of graduates and teachers of natural science in the conditions of a Federal University has been shown. The main content of this paper is the preparation of future teachers in the elegant institutes of the university. The advantages of this model are indicated in the example of the preparation of future teachers of chemistry (bachelor). Innovative components for preparing graduates and master's degree holders in natural science education is linked with the following possibilities: modern laboratory facilities (Innovative Chemical Corps); the construction of the educational process through the integration of new information (computer, internet technology, electronic portfolio and etc.) and traditional technologies of natural sciences; implementation of a continuous pedagogical practice in the lyceums of Universities; and the intensification of practice-oriented training of students and their theses, taking into account the educational needs of the Republic of Tatarstan and Volga region of Russia as a whole.

Keywords: Graduates and master's degree holders, the training of teachers of natural sciences, innovative scientific and educational activities

Introduction

Education as well as natural sciences should not be isolated from the fundamental changes that has

been occurring in the society and the economy. Here are few events that have influenced structural

changes in the economy, and consequently, transformed graduates requirements: the growth of the role

and active usefulness of knowledge (Schratz, 2016; Mesquita, 2016), a huge breakthrough in

information and communication technologies (Abasov & Abdullayev 2011), the formation of the

intellectual labor market (McMahon, 2016), and political changes in the world community (Mutton,

2016; Sakhieva, Gilmanshina et al, 2015.). As a result, the main focus of universities is becoming the

satisfaction of individual knowledge, to enable it compete and adapt successfully in the modern world

(Gafurov, 2016), through the implementation of an innovative component of the bachelor's and

master's degrees.

Research problem: The innovative components of scientific-pedagogical maintenance, and the

process of preparation of graduates, masters and teachers of natural sciences, for education at the

university level.

Objective: to develop innovative components of the scientific-pedagogical maintenance and the

processes of preparing graduates, master's degree holders and teachers for university science education.

Metodological framework

The leading approach to the study of this problem is the competence and activity approach that

contributes to the practical orientation of training, related to the acquisition of skills and competences,

necessary for future professional activities of students in modern social and economic conditions. This

set of competences is provided by the introduction of remote and design technologies, and other

technology portfolio in the educational processes, of graduates and master's degree holders.

Results

Professional and pedagogical activities in the new socio-economic conditions

Today, in the global concept of sustainable development, the work of a teacher of natural sciences

requires an emphasis on energy conservation and energy efficiency. It is possible through relevant

project activities (Gilmanshina & Gilmanshin, 2015), an a high level of professional thinking of the

teacher (Gilmanshina, Sagitova et al, 2015; Samigullina et al, 2015.). There is a need for a new way to

consider the specifics of professional-pedagogical activities of teachers of natural sciences. This will be

based on the generally accepted science view of professional activities (Rubinstein, 1989; Zimnyaya,

1997), and professionalism of the person (Klimov, 2004; Zeer, 2006).

Activity according to Zimnyaya (1997), is a form of active, purposeful interaction with the outside

world (including other people). The main characteristics of activity are the following: objectivity, task

orientation, mediation, motivation and productivity. The goal of the professional-pedagogical activities

of a teacher of natural sciences, is the organization of learning activities of students, aimed at

developing their socio-cultural experience, as the basis and conditions of their own development. A

structural shift causes a change in purpose of the teacher's activities, since the new creative structure of

education implies that the purpose of activities is the spiritual and creative development of students.

Activity is a system of actions, combined into a single unit including the motive prompting one to

achieve this goal. The meaning of the activities, determines the motive. The motif is associated with the

satisfaction of the needs of teachers. The products of pedagogical activities are formed by students

individual experiences in it's totality. The result of educational activities becomes the establishment and

development of the student as a person.

Pedagogical activity is the specific labour activity of a teacher. This civic ethics and teacher

determine the direction of this labour. The peculiarity of a teacher's activity is that it is structurally

complex, and it consists of several interrelated species. Depending on the purpose of work, the teacher

carries out the following activities: teaching, activities in the field of subject specialization,

communicative, managerial, administrative, economic, and social activities.

The leading activity of a teacher is the pedagogical activity, which is crucial in the formation of his

personality. Pedagogical activity which is carried out at the reproductive level, imposes certain

requirements for the individual – research and creative requirements. The transition from one level of

implementation of pedagogical activity to another, as rightly pointed by Zeer (2006), is accompanied

by a restructuring of the personality.

Consequently, in the current socio-economic conditions, it is required that the orientation training of

teachers of natural sciences should not generally focus on the acquisition of knowledge and skills, but

on the formation of the ability to creatively solve problems arising in professional pedagogical

situations and activities. In this case, the main task of training a natural sciences teacher becomes

humanistic, mastering the methodology of the creative transformation of the world, harmonizing the

relationship between the system of «man – nature – society», and not just studying of laws of nature

and society.

Research and introduction of new forms and ways of transmitting contents of higher education today,

are considered necessary for the development of key competences in future graduates and masters

degree holders, that ensure the productivity of social and professional activities. With the rapid aging of

knowledge, development of certain personal qualities becomes the basis of professional mobility.

An extensive list of new requirements for graduates and master's degree holders, which should be

reflected in the curricula of education and training institutions, was highlighted by Shadrikov

(Shadrikov, 2004). It drew attention to the differences in the requirements for knowledge and skills,

depending on the level of education (Bachelor, Master). General requirements for the curriculum are:

flexibility, availability of premises for training in accordance with the changing needs of the labour

market; availability of knowledge demanded in the market of educational services and the labour

market, with its demand for skilled workers; preparation of bachelors and masters in accordance with

today's needs and future strategic directions; and a combination of fundamental and innovative training.

As it is known, a factor for the selection of educational content and forms, for the implementation of

educational processes is the Model Bachelors (Master). Model Bachelor (Master) can be a description

of functions, preparations, and qualities required. The adequacy of the model is manifested in the fact

that the requirements in the description of the models are made to the extent that is sufficient to achieve

the goal.

The purpose of higher education today is not only to teach a person to do something, or seek a

profession, but also to enable him or her to cope with a variety of business and life situations, and work

in a group. Therefore, for many years, the qualification model was demanded, strictly due to the object

and the subject of the labour markets, it is now superseded by the model professional appearance of

graduates and master's degree holders, on the basis of competence.

Thus, the feature of the natural science education of future teachers in the new socio-economic

conditions is mainly the need to master modern methods of teaching subjects, for the purpose of the

formation of core competencies and readiness, for the implementation of independent cognitive

activities (educational competence, involving the accumulation of integrated knowledge and then

applying in practice).

The innovative distributed model of graduates-teachers and master's degree holders of natural sciences in education

The distributed model of training future teachers of chemistry and physics has been implemented in

Kazan (Volga region) Federal University since 2011, at the Chemical Institute named after A.M.

Butlerov, and in the Institute of Physics.

Let’s consider the advantages of this model on the example of preparation of future teachers of

chemistry (bachelor's degree). This model allows, firstly, for the possible use of modern laboratory

facilities (Innovative Chemical Corps), which was presented to the Kazan (Volga region) Federal

University by the President of the Republic of Tatarstan (R.N. Minnikhanov). Secondly, it becomes

possible to build a learning process by integrating new information (computer, Internet technology,

electronic portfolio, etc.), and traditional learning technologies of natural sciences. Thirdly, it makes it

possible to implement a continuous teaching practice, beginning with the 1st year students from KFU

(IT-lyceum, Lobachevsky Lyceum), which in turn increases the motivation and practice-oriented

training of students. Fourthly, it makes it possible to increase the motivation for the choice of a

teaching profession, through the active work with gifted children, and the implementation of innovative

projects such as; «Small Chemical Institute», «Festival of Chemistry», «KidsSpace» (Kazan), the

Houses of Children and Youth (Kazan, Ulyanovsk), and «Innovations in teaching».

The training of master's degree teachers of natural science education (chemistry education, physical

education, biology education, etc.) commences in September, 2016 in Kazan (Volga region) Federal

University. An innovative component of the training is associated with the use of new laboratories of

Chemical Corps KFU, the implementation of continuous student teaching of undergraduates in the best

schools of Kazan, practice-orientation of their theses taking into account the educational needs of

Republic of Tatarstan and Kazan Federal University.

Conclusion

The innovation components of the scientific-pedagogical maintenance of processes in the

preparation of bachelor's and master's degree-teachers in the system of university science education,

with the example of preparation of future teachers of chemistry was illustrated. It has been established

that its role lies in the creative development of students, formation of their scientific outlook,

professional thinking, culture, informational activities, and competitiveness in the new environment of

developmental education.

Recommendations

The content of the article has practical values for university teachers of natural sciences, for future teachers and young teachers of natural science disciplines, and students of refresher courses.

In view of the results of this study, we can identify a number of scientific problems and promising areas for further consideration: the deepening and extension of certain provisions contained in the article related to the formation and accumulation of scientific and pedagogical potentials of the innovative training of future teachers of natural sciences.

References

  • Abasov, S.E. & Abdullayev, S.G. (2011, September 29). Modern information and communication technologies in education. Direct access: http://www.rsvpu.ru/filedirectory/3468/nito2011_1.pdf.

  • Gafurov, I.R. (2016). The modern history of teacher education in Kazan Federal University: from

  • misunderstanding to priority. IFTE 2016 - II International Forum on Teacher Education(book-of-abst.), 7-9.

  • Gilmanshina, S.I. & Gilmanshin, I.R. (2015). Building axiological competence of graduate students by means of project-based learning.IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 86 (1), 012029-12032.

  • Gilmanshina, S.I., Sagitova R.N., Kosmodemyanskaya, S.S., Khalikova, F.D., Shchaveleva, N.G., Valitova, G.F. (2015). Professional Thinking Formation Features of Prospective Natural Science Teachers Relying on the Competence-Based Approach. Review of European Studies, 7 (3), 341-349.

  • Klimov, E.A. (2004). Psychology of professional self-determination. Moscow: Academy. 302.

  • Mesquita, A. (2016). The role of HEL, lifelong learning, career development and teachers, performance assessment in the creation of a Knowledge-based society – the case of Portugal. IFTE 2016 - II International Forum on Teacher Education(book-of-abstracts), 21.

  • McMahon, M. (2016). Developing future school leaders and the critical role of teacher education. IFTE 2016 - II International Forum on Teacher Education(book-of-abstracts), 15-16.

  • Mutton, T. (2016). Learing to teach in England: connecting the macro with the micro. IFTE 2016 - II International Forum on Teacher Education(book-of-abstracts), 11-12.

  • Rubinstein, S. L. (1989). Fundamentals of General Psychology. T. 2. Moscow: Pedagogika, 328.

  • Sakhieva, R.G., Gilmanshina, S.I., Gilmanshin, I.R., Kosmodemyanskaya, S.S., Akchurina, I.R., Sagitova, R.N. (2015). A Portfolio as an Alternative Means of Presenting the University Student’s Achievements. Asian Social Science, 11 (3), 162-167.

  • Samigullina, G.S., Gilmanchina, S.I., Gaisin, I.T., Gilmanshin, I.R., Akchurina, I.R. (2015) Professional and Creative Development of Natural Geographic Course Teachers within the Process of Professional Retraining. International Education Studies, 8 (4). DOI:

  • Schratz, M. (2016). From Best Practice to NextPractice: Searching for a new approach to learning to teach. IFTE 2016 - II International Forum on Teacher Education(book-of-abstracts), 12-13.

  • Shadrikov, V.D. (2004). New model of the specialist: innovative training and competence approach. Higher education today. 8. 26-31.

  • Zeer, E.F. (2006). Psychology professions. Moscow: Academic Project; Mir. 336.

  • Zimnyaya, I.A. (1997). Pedagogical psychology. Rostov n/D: Deniks. 480.

Copyright information

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

About this article

Publication Date

20 July 2016

eBook ISBN

978-1-80296-011-2

Publisher

Future Academy

Volume

12

Print ISBN (optional)

-

Edition Number

1st Edition

Pages

1-451

Subjects

Teacher, teacher training, teaching skills, teaching techniques, organization of education, management of education, FLT, language, language teaching theory, language teaching methods

Cite this article as:

Gilmanshina, S. I., Sagitova, R. N., & Gilmanshin, I. R. (2016). Innovative Components for Preparing Graduates and Masters Degree Holders of Natural Sciences, for Education at the University Level. In R. Valeeva (Ed.), Teacher Education - IFTE 2016, vol 12. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 55-59). Future Academy. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2016.07.10