Effects of an innovative group program of multisensory stimulation of older adults
Table 1: Characterization of the sample for experimental design, sex, marital status and educational qualifications
|
|
Total (n=33) |
GI (n=16) |
GC (n=17) |
GI vs GC |
|
|
N (%) |
N (%) |
N (%) |
X2, p |
| Experimental design |
33 (100%) |
16 (48.5%) |
17 (51.5%) |
|
| Sex |
Male |
11 (33.3%) |
5 (31.3%) |
6 (35.3%) |
.06 |
| Female |
22 (66.7%) |
11 (68.8%) |
11 (64.7%) |
|
| Marital Status |
Not married |
4 (12.1%) |
1 (6.3%) |
3 (17.6%) |
2.35 |
| Married |
3 (9.1%) |
1 (6.3%) |
2 (11.8%) |
|
| Facto f Union |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
|
| Divorced |
1 (3%) |
1 (6.3%) |
0 (0%) |
|
| Widower |
25 (75.8%) |
13 (81.3%) |
12 (70.6%) |
|
| Qualifications |
Illiterate |
9 (27.3%) |
5 (31.3%) |
4 (23.5%) |
3.13 |
| Primary school |
21 (63.6%) |
10 (62.5%) |
11 (64.7%) |
|
| High school |
2 (6.1%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (11.8%) |
|
| Higher education |
1 (3.0%) |
1 (6.3%) |
0 (0%) |
|
< Back to article
