| Major Findings |
Contribution for FDRA in urban morphology framework |
References |
| Regional flood risk assessment methods are defined into four methodologies: 1) statistical methods; 2) multi-criteria analysis; 3) GIS and RS techniques, and 4) scenario-based analysis |
Engineering approach in risk analysis |
Lyu et al. (2019);Van Westen (2013); Moghadas et al. (2019) |
| Index System of urban flood risk assessment categorized into four elements:Element of HazardEnvironment susceptibilityThe vulnerability of the disaster-relevance frameCompetence of City itself in disaster prevention and resilience |
Variables aspects used in risk analysis stageScenario-based analysis as an assessment method |
Shi et al. (2019) |
| The intersection between concepts of morphology and Complex Adaptive System (CAS) identify drivers of risk, vulnerability, capacity and resilience at a range of scales across disaster and development contexts |
Assessment model as basic principles for developing FDRA in urban morphology frameworkIndex System as a static analysis method in risk analysis stage |
Sitko (2017) |
| Urban Design Resilience Index (UDRI) structure as urban design program which can accommodate the city's adaptation performance for coping with unknowing future |
Variables in UDRI concepts used for developing FDRA component aspects in risk analysis |
Dhar & Khirfan (2017) |
| Spatial planning and flood-risk management consolidation used the capability of Geographic Information (GI) and Geographic Technologies (GT) in Spatially Integrated Policy Infrastructure (SIPI) structure |
Assessment model in FDRA focus on spatial aspect |
Ran & Nedovic-Budic (2016) |
| Hypothetical relationship between urban form (land use mix, population density, building type and diversity) and resiliency |
Identified urban form as driver risk Statistical techniques as an assessment method |
Irajifar et al. (2016) |
